Jordan's approach to nationality restrictions in its citizenship by investment program represents a striking departure from global norms. While most CBI programs explicitly ban 3-12 nationalities, Jordan maintains no formal list of prohibited countries for its investment citizenship scheme, instead relying on rigorous individual security assessments that result in a 50% rejection rate - among the highest in the industry. This unique model, combined with the program's fundamental restructuring in July 2025 that eliminated all passive investment routes, positions Jordan as an outlier in the global investment migration landscape.

The absence of explicit nationality restrictions masks a more complex reality. Jordan's Ministry of Interior maintains a comprehensive list of 56 "restricted countries" requiring prior approval for general immigration purposes, creating a de facto screening mechanism that affects CBI applicants from nations including Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, and most of sub-Saharan Africa. This approach allows Jordan to maintain diplomatic flexibility while exercising stringent security controls through enhanced due diligence procedures that can extend processing times from weeks to months depending on an applicant's country of origin.

Since launching in February 2018, Jordan's CBI program has granted citizenship to 531 foreign investors through December 2024, generating $1.38 billion in investment capital. The primary beneficiaries have been Syrian and Iraqi nationals seeking regional stability, along with smaller numbers from Palestine, Finland, Canada, Lebanon, Yemen, the United States, Pakistan, India, and even Saint Kitts and Nevis. This diverse applicant pool, particularly the inclusion of nationals from countries commonly banned by other programs, demonstrates Jordan's commitment to individual merit-based assessment over blanket nationality exclusions.

Security through screening replaces explicit nationality bans

Jordan's citizenship by investment program operates under a fundamentally different philosophy than its global counterparts. Where Caribbean programs explicitly prohibit applications from countries like Iran, North Korea, and Russia, and Malta's terminated program banned 12 nationalities outright, Jordan has chosen a path of comprehensive individual vetting without formal nationality restrictions. This approach reflects the kingdom's broader strategic positioning as a stable mediator in a volatile region, maintaining relationships across traditional geopolitical divides.

The program functions under Jordan's Nationality Law No. 6 of 1954, which provides the constitutional framework for all citizenship matters. Notably, this law contains historical nationality-based distinctions, including provisions regarding Palestinian nationality that demonstrate constitutional precedent for differentiated treatment based on origin. However, for the CBI program specifically, Jordan has avoided codifying explicit nationality bans, instead implementing what researchers describe as a system of "intentional ambiguity" that grants officials broad discretionary authority in citizenship decisions.

The 56 restricted countries that face enhanced scrutiny span three continents. In Asia, the list includes Afghanistan, Iran, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Philippines, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Mongolia, Myanmar, Nepal, Iraq, Yemen, Bangladesh, and Papua New Guinea. Africa accounts for 39 restricted countries, encompassing Ethiopia, Eritrea, Central African Republic, Angola, Uganda, and most nations in sub-Saharan Africa. From the Americas, only Belize and Cuba appear on the restricted list. Additionally, all bearers of "Travel Pass" documents from any country except Vatican City State face automatic restrictions.

These restrictions don't constitute outright bans but trigger enhanced security clearance procedures through Jordan's General Intelligence Directorate and multi-agency vetting processes. Applicants from restricted countries undergo extended background investigations, source of funds verification, and cross-referencing against international security databases including Interpol, Europol, and various sanctions lists. The result is a system that achieves security objectives through process rather than prohibition.

Historical evolution reveals consistent openness despite regional tensions

Jordan launched its CBI program in February 2018 during a period of exceptional regional instability. The Syrian civil war had created massive refugee flows, Iranian influence was expanding across Syria and Iraq, ISIS remained a significant threat, and cross-border trafficking of drugs and weapons plagued Jordan's northern borders. Despite these security challenges that might typically prompt restrictive nationality policies, Jordan maintained an open eligibility framework from the program's inception.

The initial investment options included a $1.5 million bank deposit at zero interest for five years, $1.5 million in treasury bonds for ten years, $1.5 million in company shares with a three-year holding period, or business investments creating 20 jobs. In 2019, Jordan reduced these thresholds, lowering the bank deposit to $1 million for three years and the treasury bond requirement to $1 million for six years, while maintaining the open nationality policy despite deteriorating regional security.

Throughout 2020-2024, Jordan faced escalating security challenges including Iranian proxy threats, weapons smuggling attempts, and the spillover effects of conflicts in Gaza, Lebanon, and Syria. The kingdom conducted airstrikes against drug smugglers in Syria, foiled Iranian weapons plots, and enhanced border security cooperation with Israel and the United States. Yet even these extraordinary circumstances didn't prompt the introduction of formal nationality restrictions for the CBI program, distinguishing Jordan's approach from the reactive ban lists common among other programs.

The July 2, 2025 restructuring represents the most significant change in the program's history, though it focused on economic requirements rather than nationality restrictions. The Cabinet eliminated all passive investment options including bank deposits and treasury bonds, introducing eight new pathways that mandate active business involvement and job creation. These include sector-specific routes for pharmaceuticals, logistics, technology, and manufacturing, with investment thresholds ranging from 350,000 to 3 million Jordanian dinars depending on sector and location. The universal requirement for creating 10-150 jobs for Jordanian nationals transforms the program from a traditional CBI model to an employment-focused investment immigration scheme.

Comparative analysis highlights Jordan's unique global position

Jordan's approach to nationality restrictions stands in stark contrast to global CBI programs, which typically maintain explicit banned nationality lists based on international sanctions, security concerns, and reputational management. Among 13 major CBI programs analyzed, Jordan and Austria are the only two maintaining no formal nationality restrictions, though Austria's program operates at significantly higher investment thresholds and targets ultra-high net worth individuals through different mechanisms.

Caribbean programs demonstrate varying levels of restrictiveness. Antigua and Barbuda bans eight nationalities including Afghanistan, Belarus, Iran, North Korea, Russia, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen, with limited exceptions for those who emigrated before reaching majority age. St. Kitts and Nevis prohibits six nationalities with no exceptions. Dominica takes a nuanced approach with four outright bans (Belarus, Northern Iraq, Russia, Yemen) and two conditional restrictions for North Korea and Sudan requiring 10-year absence from those countries. Grenada similarly combines three outright bans with four conditional restrictions, while St. Lucia maintains the most permissive Caribbean approach with only three banned nationalities.

Turkey's CBI program, Jordan's most direct regional competitor, explicitly bans only Armenia, Cuba, and North Korea - reflecting specific bilateral tensions rather than broad security concerns. Egypt, the only other active Middle Eastern CBI program, follows Jordan's model of avoiding formal nationality restrictions while maintaining rigorous individual vetting procedures. This regional pattern suggests a Middle Eastern preference for discretionary assessment over codified exclusions.

The now-terminated Malta program represented the most restrictive approach globally, banning 12 nationalities including Afghanistan, Belarus, Democratic Republic of Congo, Iran, North Korea, Russia, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria, Venezuela, and Yemen before the EU Court of Justice ruled the program incompatible with EU law in April 2025. Malta's extensive ban list reflected EU sanctions alignment and heightened reputational concerns given the program's provision of EU citizenship rights.

Jordan's ability to maintain an open nationality policy while ensuring security relies on a sophisticated legal framework combining constitutional provisions, administrative regulations, and international compliance mechanisms. The foundation rests on the 1954 Nationality Law, which establishes broad governmental discretion in citizenship matters and requires Council of Ministers approval for all naturalizations. Articles 18-19 provide authority to revoke citizenship from those who "commit or attempt to commit an act deemed to endanger the peace and security of the State," creating post-grant enforcement mechanisms.

The administrative framework involves multiple agencies in the vetting process. The Jordan Investment Commission handles initial application processing and investment verification. The Ministry of Interior conducts security clearances and background investigations. The General Intelligence Directorate performs national security assessments. Various line ministries verify sector-specific investment compliance. The Council of Ministers exercises final approval authority, with decisions ultimately requiring royal endorsement. This multi-layered approach creates numerous veto points where applications can be rejected without formal nationality-based prohibitions.

Jordan's compliance with international standards adds another screening layer. As a member of the Middle East and North Africa Financial Action Task Force (MENAFATF), Jordan implements anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing standards that require enhanced due diligence for higher-risk jurisdictions. Though removed from FATF monitoring in October 2023, Jordan maintains the enhanced procedures developed during that period. All CBI applicants undergo screening against OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals list, UN Security Council sanctions lists, EU terrorism and proliferation financing lists, and other international databases.

The concept of "intentional ambiguity" documented by scholars studying Jordan's citizenship policies proves particularly relevant. Research shows systematic divergence between written law and implementation practices, with senior officials writing subsidiary legislation that expands discretionary authority beyond statutory requirements. This allows nationality-based discrimination in practice while maintaining formal neutrality in written policy, providing diplomatic flexibility and avoiding explicit confrontation with origin countries.

Due diligence procedures create functional nationality screening

Jordan's due diligence process for CBI applicants incorporates multiple stages that effectively screen based on nationality without explicit prohibitions. The initial application requires extensive documentation including police clearances from all countries of residence, source of funds verification going back seven years, business ownership records, and professional references. Applicants from the 56 restricted countries face additional documentary requirements and extended verification timelines.

The security clearance process involves cross-referencing applicants against domestic and international databases. Jordan's intelligence services maintain extensive files on regional security threats, particularly regarding individuals connected to extremist groups, Iranian proxy networks, or criminal organizations involved in drug and weapons trafficking. The kingdom's security cooperation agreements with the United States, United Kingdom, and regional partners provide access to additional intelligence resources for vetting purposes.

Financial verification presents another screening mechanism. Applicants must demonstrate legitimate sources for investment funds through bank statements, tax returns, business financial records, and transaction histories. Those from countries with weak banking systems, widespread corruption, or limited financial transparency face heightened scrutiny. The Central Bank of Jordan participates in verification for banking-related investments, applying know-your-customer standards that can effectively exclude applicants unable to meet international banking norms.

The investment monitoring requirements introduced in the July 2025 restructuring add ongoing compliance obligations. All approved investors must maintain their business operations, meet job creation targets, and submit regular reports to relevant authorities. This continuous oversight allows authorities to revoke citizenship for non-compliance, providing post-approval enforcement mechanisms that complement front-end screening.

Statistical analysis reveals selective approval patterns

Program statistics illuminate how Jordan's discretionary approach functions in practice. From February 2018 through December 2024, the program received approximately 1,062 applications based on the 50% rejection rate and 531 approvals. The geographic distribution of successful applicants reveals clear patterns: Syrian and Iraqi nationals represent the largest approved groups, followed by Palestinians, Lebanese, and Yemenis - all regional nationals seeking stability. Western nationals from Finland, Canada, and the United States comprise a smaller cohort, likely attracted by business opportunities rather than security concerns.

Notably absent from the successful applicant list are nationals from countries commonly banned by other programs. No Iranian, North Korean, or Afghan citizens appear among reported approvals, suggesting that enhanced vetting effectively excludes these nationals despite the absence of formal bans. The inclusion of Pakistani and Yemeni citizens - both on the restricted countries list - demonstrates that enhanced scrutiny doesn't constitute an absolute bar, merely additional vetting requirements.

The average investment per successful applicant of approximately $7 million far exceeds minimum thresholds, indicating that approved investors bring substantial capital beyond basic requirements. This suggests that marginal applicants who merely meet minimum criteria face higher rejection likelihood, with approvals favoring those demonstrating exceptional financial capacity and business credibility regardless of nationality.

The modest program scale - averaging just 81 approvals annually from 2021-2024 - reflects Jordan's quality-over-quantity approach. Compared to Caribbean programs processing hundreds or thousands of applications annually, Jordan's limited numbers enable thorough individual assessment while maintaining program exclusivity. The annual cap of 500 approvals ensures vetting resources aren't overwhelmed, though actual approvals remain well below this ceiling.

Economic impact shapes policy priorities

Jordan's CBI program has generated $1.38 billion in investment capital through December 2024, providing crucial foreign exchange during a period of economic challenges. The kingdom faces persistent unemployment at 21.4%, a current account deficit, and limited natural resources, making foreign investment essential for economic development. The program's job creation requirements directly address unemployment concerns, with approved projects generating over 7,300 positions for Jordanian nationals.

The July 2025 restructuring reflects evolved economic priorities emphasizing productive investment over passive capital. The eight new sector-specific pathways target industries where Jordan maintains competitive advantages or strategic ambitions. The pharmaceutical sector, contributing 19% growth in 2024 with exports to over 80 countries, receives preferential treatment with specialized investment routes. The logistics sector, valued at $2.36 billion with projected growth to $2.89 billion by 2030, benefits from Jordan's strategic location between Asian manufacturing and European markets.

Geographic incentives in the new framework encourage investment outside the capital, with lower thresholds for projects in governorates beyond Amman. This addresses regional development disparities and spreads economic benefits beyond the concentrated Amman metropolitan area. The employment requirements increase dramatically for Amman-based projects (150 jobs) versus regional projects (100 jobs), further incentivizing geographic distribution.

The elimination of passive investment options acknowledges that bank deposits and treasury bond purchases provided limited economic benefit beyond foreign exchange. While these options generated initial capital inflows, they created no employment, transferred no technology, and built no productive capacity. The new framework ensures every citizenship grant corresponds to tangible economic development through business operations and job creation.

Regional dynamics influence security calculations

Jordan's geopolitical position fundamentally shapes its approach to CBI nationality policies. As a kingdom bordering Syria, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Israel, and the Palestinian territories, Jordan sits at the intersection of multiple regional conflicts and competing spheres of influence. This geography necessitates diplomatic balancing that precludes explicit nationality bans that might antagonize important regional relationships.

The Syrian refugee crisis brought over 650,000 registered refugees to Jordan, with total Syrian residents estimated at 1.3 million. This massive influx created security challenges but also humanitarian obligations and international support dependencies. Explicitly banning Syrian nationals from the CBI program would contradict Jordan's role as a responsible humanitarian actor while potentially alienating international donors supporting refugee programs.

Iranian influence in neighboring Syria and Iraq presents complex security challenges without simple solutions. While Jordan participated in U.S.-led efforts to counter Iranian proxy networks and conducted military operations against Iran-linked drug smuggling operations, maintaining diplomatic channels with Tehran remains important for regional stability. An explicit ban on Iranian nationals would escalate tensions without necessarily improving security, as Iranian intelligence operations don't depend on citizenship access.

Jordan's peace treaty with Israel and security cooperation agreements create another layer of complexity. While this relationship provides intelligence sharing and border security benefits, it also makes Jordan a potential target for groups opposed to normalization. The CBI program's security screening must account for these threats without creating diplomatic incidents through formal nationality exclusions that might be perceived as discriminatory.

International pressure and future program evolution

The global regulatory environment for CBI programs continues tightening, with potential implications for Jordan's nationality-neutral approach. The FATF-OECD joint report on "Misuse of Citizenship and Residency by Investment Programs" published in 2023 identified specific risks including money laundering, tax evasion, corruption, and circumvention of sanctions. These findings drive pressure for enhanced due diligence, transparent policies, and potential nationality restrictions aligned with international sanctions regimes.

The European Union's escalating campaign against CBI programs culminated in the April 2025 European Court of Justice ruling terminating Malta's program. The EU continues pressuring Caribbean programs through visa waiver leverage, demanding enhanced vetting and potential nationality exclusions. While Jordan lacks EU visa waiver agreements that provide similar leverage, international financial system access creates comparable pressure points for compliance with global standards.

The United States exhibits growing concern about CBI programs' security implications, particularly regarding visa waiver eligibility and potential terrorist travel. Draft legislation proposing travel restrictions on certain CBI passport holders could affect Jordan's program attractiveness if implemented. U.S. pressure already influenced recent Caribbean program changes including enhanced vetting, mandatory interviews, and expanded information sharing.

Jordan's Major Non-NATO Ally status since 1996 creates both opportunities and obligations regarding security cooperation. Intelligence sharing agreements provide resources for enhanced vetting but also create expectations for alignment with U.S. security priorities. Future U.S. pressure might target Jordan's accommodation of nationals from countries under U.S. sanctions, potentially forcing reconsideration of the current nationality-neutral approach.

Sustainability of Jordan's unique approach

The viability of maintaining no formal nationality restrictions while ensuring security depends on several factors. Jordan's sophisticated intelligence apparatus, developed through decades of navigating regional threats, provides capabilities for individual threat assessment that smaller nations lack. The kingdom's experience managing diverse refugee populations created institutional knowledge for processing foreign nationals from challenging security environments.

The modest program scale enables thorough vetting within existing institutional capacity. Processing 80-100 applications annually allows detailed individual assessment impossible for programs handling thousands of cases. The 50% rejection rate demonstrates willingness to refuse questionable applications rather than compromise standards for revenue. This quality-over-quantity approach may prove more sustainable than high-volume programs facing pressure to maintain revenue targets.

Economic necessity argues for maintaining openness to diverse nationalities. With regional nationals comprising the primary applicant pool, explicit bans on Syrian, Iraqi, or other Middle Eastern nationalities would eliminate most potential investors. The $1.38 billion generated represents crucial foreign investment for Jordan's challenged economy. Restricting eligible nationalities could undermine economic benefits while creating diplomatic complications.

However, international pressure may eventually force Jordan to adopt explicit nationality restrictions. If major financial centers begin restricting services to Jordanian passport holders suspected of obtaining citizenship through investment, the program's value proposition would diminish. Similarly, if security incidents involving CBI citizens generate international criticism, Jordan might implement formal restrictions to preserve the program's reputation and broader bilateral relationships.

Conclusion

Jordan's citizenship by investment program represents a sophisticated experiment in achieving security through process rather than prohibition. By maintaining no formal nationality bans while implementing rigorous individual vetting that produces a 50% rejection rate, Jordan demonstrates an alternative to the explicit restriction lists common among global CBI programs. This approach reflects the kingdom's broader strategic culture of pragmatic flexibility, avoiding rigid positions that might constrain diplomatic maneuverability in a complex regional environment.

The July 2025 restructuring reinforces Jordan's distinct approach by eliminating passive investment options and mandating job creation across all pathways. While this reduces appeal for applicants seeking quick citizenship through minimal engagement, it positions Jordan to attract genuine business operators contributing to economic development. The focus on productive investment over financial transfers aligns with national development priorities while maintaining the security-through-screening model for nationality considerations.

The sustainability of Jordan's nationality-neutral approach faces tests from evolving international standards, regional security dynamics, and economic pressures. Success requires maintaining the delicate balance between openness and security, ensuring that discretionary vetting effectively screens risks without creating discriminatory practices that undermine program credibility. As global pressure on CBI programs intensifies, Jordan's unique model offers lessons on achieving security objectives through sophisticated process design rather than blunt exclusionary instruments.

For potential applicants, particularly those from commonly restricted nationalities, Jordan's program presents unique opportunities tempered by uncertainty. The absence of formal bans creates theoretical eligibility, but enhanced scrutiny and high rejection rates mean approval remains far from guaranteed. The new employment-focused structure demands genuine business commitment beyond financial capacity, selecting for investors aligned with Jordan's economic development objectives rather than those seeking merely transactional citizenship acquisition.

Jordan's approach ultimately reflects a bet that sophisticated individual assessment can achieve security objectives more effectively than categorical nationality exclusions. In an era of increasing global mobility and complex transnational threats, this nuanced approach may prove either prescient or naive. The program's continued evolution will provide important data points for understanding how investment migration programs can balance security, economic, and diplomatic objectives in an interconnected yet fragmented world.